Harimau Selatan bermula garang

Piala pertama JDT musim ini, setelah 29 tahun akhirnya piala sumbangsih milik JDT. Tahniah.

Kemarau Kejuaraan Berakhir

Dahagakan kejuaraan selama 23 tahun, pasukan bola sepak JDT akhirnya ditabalkan sebagai Juara Liga Super 2014. Tahniah TMJ dan JDT

MAQIS

Logo Malaysian Quarantine and Inspection Services, Jabatan baru dalam Kementerian Pertanian dan Industri Asas Tani

Dua Tokoh Politik Negara Paling Berkarisma

Seorang telah pergi ke rahmatullah dan seorang lagi dikuarantin pengaruh politiknya.

Sultan Johor

Baginda bertitah GST tidak masuk akal

JDT CIPTA SEJARAH BOLASEPAK ASIA TENGGARA

JDT menjadi pasukan bolasepak pertama dari Malaysia dan juga Asia Tenggara merangkul Piala AFC.

PEREYRA DIAZ

Setelah beria ia kembali pada pasukan JDT. Pemain tiada disiplin ini akhirnya belot terhadap pasukan JDT.

Kehilangan MH370 pesawat MAS

Dunia dikejutkan dengan kehilangan pesawat MH370 milik MAS pada 8hb Mac 2014. Pesawat yang menuju ke China tersebut membawa 239 penumpang.

Import Keempat Harapan JDT 2016

Pemain yang berasal daripada Argentina ini menjadi pertaruhan dan harapan JDT untuk perkuatkan pasukan.

Zika Virus

Tiba-tiba virus ini menular di seluruh dunia. Malah virus ini memberi kesan kepada bayi dalam kandungan.

Ahad, 30 Mac 2014

Flight MH370: The race to recover doomed plane

As search teams narrow down their hunt for the doomed Malaysian airliner, investigators are already preparing for the difficult underwater task to come. Investigators probably have about two weeks before the jet’s black boxes — the flight recorders — stop automatically pinging. If they can find them in time, specialized equipment will be sent down to bring back the recorders that could solve the mystery of MH370.
MH370-940

Adakah kita menunggu tragedi yang lain? Noor Azam Shairi | Kemas kini: Mac 30, 2014

KENAPA Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia tidak menyemak pasport di pintu keluar masuk negara dengan pangkalan data senarai pasport curi yang disimpan oleh Interpol?

Jawapannya, pertama, Interpol menyimpan rekod 40.2 juta pasport yang dilaporkan hilang; jumlah itu terlalu besar dan pangkalan data Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia tidak mampu menyimpannya berdasarkan kapasiti sedia ada. Kedua, proses menyemaknya akan memakan masa yang lama kecualilah kalau Interpol memasukkan pasport berkenaan dalam senarai suspek supaya mudah pihak Imigresen memantaunya.

Itulah lebih kurang bunyinya kenyataan Menteri Dalam Negeri, Datuk Seri Dr. Ahmad Zahid Hamidi di Dewan Rakyat pada Rabu lepas. Beliau menjawab soalan yang dikemukakan oleh enam ahli parlimen berhubung urusan imigresen setelah dua warga Iran dikesan masuk dan keluar negara ini dengan menggunakan pasport curi.

Jawapan menteri itu dibidas oleh Interpol dalam satu kenyataan media pada Sabtu, semalam.

Kenyataan Interpol tidak berselindung — tepat terus ke batang hidung. Interpol menegaskan keputusan Malaysia tidak merujuk senarai pasport curi dan hilang yang ada padanya tidak boleh disalahkan kepada teknologi atau Interpol sendiri. Tanggungjawab itu terletak pada Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia, kata Interpol. Titik.

Interpol juga memaklumkan proses semakan itu hanya mengambil masa yang sangat singkat — tidak sampai 0.2 saat. Kalau negara lain boleh buat, kenapa Malaysia tidak? Itulah maksud Interpol apabila ia menyebut betapa Amerika Syarikat telah menyemak rekod itu lebih 230 juta kali setiap tahun, United Kingdom lebih 140 juta kali, Emiriah Arab Bersatu lebih 100 juta kali dan Singapura lebih 29 juta kali.

Empat negara yang disebut oleh agensi polis antarabangsa itu tidak pernah merungut tentang perlahan atau lembapnya masa tindak balas atau tempoh tanggap semakan perlahan. Malah, belum pernah ada mana-mana negara anggota Interpol yang mengadu begitu. Dalam erti kata lain, Interpol hendak beritahu bahawa Malaysia adalah negara pertama di dunia yang merungut proses itu lambat.

Tetapi bukankah orang bijaksana mengungkapkan pepatah: biar lambat asalkan selamat. Atau dalam bahasa Jawa, alon alon asal kelakon.

Apa yang sebenarnya berlaku adalah, mengikut rekod Interpol, antara 1 Januari hingga 7 Mac lepas — iaitu sebelum pesawat penerbangan MH370 hilang — Imigresen tidak pernah menyemak satu pun pasport penumpang yang keluar masuk negara ini dengan pangkalan data Interpol.

"Akibatnya, dua individu yang memegang pasport curi Austria dan Itali dapat menaiki penerbangan MH370," kata Interpol.

Interpol berpendapat sekiranya Imigresen di KLIA menyemak pasport yang dipegang oleh dua warga Iran itu dengan rekod yang ada dengan Interpol maka mereka akan tahu bahawa pasport itu adalah pasport curi.

Seterusnya dalam kenyataan itu Interpol menyatakan rasa bingung kenapa ia diserang sedangkan sepatutnya lompang yang terselak dengan tragedi hilangnya pesawat Malaysia Airlines ini seharusnya jadi pengajaran.

Tetapi adakah kita mengambil apa-apa pengajaran? Kalau diteliti kenyataan menteri di Dewan Rakyat yang mulia itu, mungkin tidak ada. Kita tidak berbuat silap, jadi untuk apa buat pembetulan? Kenapa kita tidak mematuhi nasihat Interpol? Bukan salah kita; ini salah Interpol — rekodnya terlalu banyak dan sistem komputer kita tidak mampu menampung data sebesar itu. 

Apakah kesannya dengan pendirian Kementerian Dalam Negeri ini? Pertama, kenyataan balas Interpol yang keras itu jadi berita dunia. Ketika imej negara dalam menangani krisis hilangnya MH370 ini dipertikaikan oleh sesetengah pihak di peringkat antarabangsa, sikap enggan belajar daripada kesilapan ini tentulah menarik lagi perhatian mereka. Eh, kita tidak silap; ini salah Interpol.

Kedua, ini boleh diterima sebagai isyarat oleh kumpulan pengganas atau sindiket pemerdagangan orang bahawa negara ini boleh jadi laluan yang selamat untuk mereka. Apa mereka hendak takut guna pasport curi sebab Imigresen Malaysia tidak akan menyemaknya dengan data yang ada pada Interpol. Apa sebab tidak semak? Kerana proses itu leceh dan memakan masa.

Imigresen juga sudah ada SOP sendiri untuk menguruskan semakan dokumen perjalanan palsu, kata menteri di Dewan Rakyat. SOP itu sudah dipatuhi pada malam 7 Mac lalu. Tidak mengapalah kalau SOP yang dipatuhi itulah yang melepaskan dua warga Iran dengan pasport curi untuk naik pesawat di KLIA pada malam itu. Kenapa sekarang Interpol hendak bising-bising? Ini bukan salah Imigresen. Ini salah Interpol kerana pangkalan datanya terlalu besar dan untuk menyemak senarai itu akan mengambil masa.

Siasatan pihak berkuasa setakat ini tidak menunjukkan sebarang kaitan antara kehilangan pesawat Boeing 777-200 itu dengan dua penumpang Iran yang menggunakan pasport curi. Mereka itu dirumuskan sebagai orang yang merantau mencari peluang hidup baru dan terlibat dengan sindiket pemalsuan pasport.

Tidak mengapalah, kali ini kita selamat — akan datang belum tentu.

Dalam kenyataan pertama Interpol sehari selepas pesawat penerbangan MH370 hilang, Setiausaha Agung Interpol Ronald K. Noble membuat kenyataan yang bernada keluhan: "Selama bertahun-tahun Interpol bertanya kenapakah negara-negara harus menunggu sebuah tragedi untuk mengetatkan langkah keselamatan di sempadan dan pintu pelepasan."

Adakah kita menunggu tragedi yang lain? Mohon dijauhkan oleh Tuhan. Moga Tuhan akan terus melindungi kita.

Ketika kita berdoa untuk MH370, ada eloknya juga kalau kita turut berdoa untuk Malaysia.

_______________________________

NOOR AZAM SHAIRI bertanya apakah agaknya lebih selamat untuk terbang dari Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Changi, Singapura.

UK satellite operator says it only gave data on MH370’s last position

British satellite company Inmarsat has said that it is not responsible for Putrajaya’s conclusion that flight MH370 crashed into the southern Indian ocean, China Daily reported today.
Inmarsat, through the United Kingdom Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), said it only provided information of MH370’s likely last position before it stopped flying, the report said.
"We provide our information to Malaysia, and they combine that with all the other information which they have, which we wouldn't know about. And then they draw their conclusions from that and make their own announcements on that basis," Jonathan Sinnatt, a spokesperson for the British-based satellite company, was quoted as saying.
We just contribute one set of information."
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak in a press conference on Monday said that based on Inmarsat’s analysis, the ill-fated flight that was bound to Beijing, with 239 passengers and crew, ended its journey in the Southern Indian Ocean.
"Based on their new analysis, Inmarsat and the AAIB have concluded that MH370 flew along the southern corridor. And that its last position was in the middle of the Indian Ocean, west of Perth," he said.
However, the 239 families relatives were not convinced due to the lack of any physical evidence of the crash.
Families from China, where majority of the passengers were from, are still looking for more conclusive news to give them closure. – March 29, 2014.The Malaysia Insider

Selasa, 25 Mac 2014

Akhirnya Terjawab Pengakhiran MH370.

mh-najibumum513

BERIKUT KENYATAAN PENUH PERDANA MENTERI

Malam ini saya telah diberi taklimat oleh wakil-wakil dari Cawangan Siasatan Kemalangan Udara United Kingdom (AAIB).

Mereka memberitahu saya bahawa Inmarsat, syarikat UK yang menyediakan data satelit yang menunjukkan koridor utara dan selatan, telah menjalankan kiraan lanjut ke atas data berkenaan.

Menggunakan sejenis analisis tidak pernah digunakan dalam satu penyiasatan seperti ini, mereka dapat menentukan dengan lebih jelas laluan penerbangan MH370 itu.
 
Berdasarkan analisis baru mereka, Inmarsat dan AAIB telah menyimpulkan bahawa MH370 terbang di koridor selatan, dan bahawa kedudukan terakhir adalah di tengah-tengah Lautan Hindi, barat Perth.
 
Ini adalah lokasi yang jauh, jauh dari mana-mana tapak pendaratan (yang berkemungkinan).

Oleh itu, dengan kesedihan yang mendalam bahawa saya mesti memberitahu anda, menurut data terbaru ini, penerbangan MH370 berakhir di selatan Lautan Hindi.
 
Maklumat lanjut akan diberitahu dalam satu sidang akhbar esok. Sementara itu, kami mahu memberitahu anda mengenai perkembangan terbaru ini pada kesempatan pertama.

Kami berkongsi maklumat ini kerana kami komited kepada keterbukaan dan rasa hormati kepada ahli keluarga yang terlibat, dua prinsip yang menjadi amalan dalam siasatan ini.
 
Malaysia Airlines telah memberitahu keluarga penumpang dan anak kapal mengenai perkembangan terbaru ini.

Bagi mereka, beberapa minggu lalu cukup menyayat hati, saya tahu berita ini pasti lebih sukar lagi. Saya menggesa media untuk menghormati privasi mereka, dan memberikan mereka ruang yang diperlukan pada masa yang sukar ini.-24/3/2014

Dipetik daripada agendadaily.

Khamis, 20 Mac 2014

How to secure your WiFi network


Steve McWhirterMar 20, 2014
  • If you have your own WiFi network, secure it from unauthorised users and devices
  • Setting it up properly as a closed network will save you tons of headaches

IT'S easier than ever to set up a wireless network. Plop in a WiFi router and connect to a DSL or cable modem. But before you start online banking, shopping, and surfing the Web, make sure your network is secure from intruders.

You may think that your neighbour hopping onto your wireless network to check email is harmless. Actually, there is more at stake than the fact that this unauthorised person may hog up the bandwidth by streaming HD (high-definition) videos.
 
This person, once on your network, can intercept all the data you are sending, trick you into going to a malicious site, and break into computers and other devices you may have connected over the WiFi.
 
Letting someone you don't know on to your network is essentially letting that person see all the data flowing in and out.

If you have your own WiFi network, it's important you secure it from unauthorised users and devices by configuring the wireless router appropriately. While specific steps in the management software vary from vendor to vendor, and from router to router, the options are fairly universal and shouldn't be too hard to find.

Below are some tips on how to enhance your wireless network security.

1) Encrypt with WPA2

When you set up your wireless network, you had the option to turn on encryption. For home networking users, you should turn on encryption (as opposed to running an open network) and you should select WPA2 as the encryption method. WEP is not secure and some of the other methods
are generally out of reach for most home users.
 
Even if you didn't enable WPA2 when you first set up the network, your management software should let you turn it on after the fact.
 
When you select WPA2, you will be prompted to create a passkey for users to enter when trying to connect to the network. It is important – no, critical – to make sure the password is unique and complex so that outsiders can't just brute-force or guess a password and hop on to the network.
 
Make sure to select a string of characters that is fairly long and a mix of both numbers and letters. If your passkey is flimsy, then determined attackers will be able to breach your network anyway.

Don't turn on WPS (WiFi Protected Setup). It doesn't always work consistently, and its nine-digit PIN is vulnerable to guessing attempts. Once the attacker figures out the PIN for WPS, there is nothing stopping the adversary from accessing any shared data that resides on your wireless network.

2) Change default passwords

Many of the routers ship with a default password for the administrator management software. It could be ‘admin,’ or even a blank password, and is quite often printed somewhere in the documentation and available online.
 
Users should immediately change the password for the management interface while setting up the wireless network so that outsiders can't reach the management interface. If adversaries get access to the management interface, they have full control over your router and you would be in serious trouble.
 
While you are changing passwords, check to see if the router shipped with any pre-created SSIDs. SSIDs are the names of the wireless networks configured for the router. You should change the passwords for these SSIDs even if you aren't using them, just in case.

3) Clean up the list of SSID names
 
Speaking of SSIDs, vendors tend to use very generic names for the SSIDs, such as 'linksys' or 'netgear-wireless.' Change them from the default to something unique.
 
Attackers can launch man-in-the-middle attacks by using frequently used SSIDs for their rogue wireless hotspots which could be used to trick devices into connecting to that network.
 
Having a different SSID name and password ensures that it will be harder for a person to guess and break in.
 
It may be just easier to delete all the SSIDs on the router (usually listed under ‘wireless’ on the management software) other than the one you are using.
 
Why increase the potential attack surface? After you have cleaned up your list of SSIDs, hide the name. Some vendors call this cloaking, but the idea is to prevent the SSID from broadcasting to all devices in the vicinity.
 
You can connect by manually entering the name of your network, but other people won't know that network is there.

4) Regularly check who is connected
 
The management software generally has a section called ‘Device List,’ which shows the computer name of all the devices that are connected to the wireless network.
 
It's a good idea to periodically go in and check to make sure you recognise the names. To prevent unknown devices from ever being able to connect, you can enable Mac Address Filtering. This will require you to know how to get your device's hardware address (MAC Address) so that you can enter it in the software.
 
It can be a little manual and time-consuming, but it ensures no one will ever be able to get on the network without your knowing about it.

Your router has other advanced features, such as ‘guest networking,’ which you should turn off, and a firewall, which you should turn on.
 
If you aren't already running a software firewall, turning on the router's firewall is critical, but it's not a bad idea to have both to boost your layers of security.

Regularly update your router firmware when they are available, and you'll have a pretty secure wireless network. It's worth the time to set it up properly as a closed network, and will save you tons of headaches down the road.

Steve McWhirter is vice president, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa Sales, Check Point Software Technologies. This article is © ZoneAlarm and appears here with its kind permission.
 
Related Stories:
 
Information security is about you … yes, you!
 
Top 10 online security tips 
 
 
For more technology news and the latest updates, follow us on TwitterLinkedIn or Like us on Facebook.

- See more at: http://www.digitalnewsasia.com/insights/how-to-secure-your-wifi-network#sthash.hGSeP23u.dpuf

Jumaat, 14 Mac 2014

Missing jet search widens far west to Indian Ocean-USA Today

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — The search for a missing jetliner has been expanded well west of its last reported position, toward India, six days after it vanished an hour after taking off for Beijing.
White House press secretary Jay Carney said Thursday that some searchers were being shifted hundreds of miles west of Malaysia, far off course from the intended flight path of the jet.
"It is my understanding the one possible piece of information, or pieces of information, has led to the possibility that a new search area may be opened up over the Indian Ocean," said Carney, who added that the U.S. government "may be allocating" resources to that area to take part in the search.
ABC News, citing unidentified U.S. officials, said American investigators believe that two communications systems were shut down separately on the flight deck of the Malaysian Airlines Flight 370, suggesting the aircraft did not suffer catastrophic failure.
The data reporting system, the network reported, was shut down at 1:07 a.m. The transponder -- which transmits location and altitude -- shut down at 1:21 a.m.
Marine Lt. Col. Jeff Pool, a Pentagon spokesman, said Thursday that the USS Kidd is moving to the Straits of Malacca and will arrive in the search area in a day or two.
Meanwhile, Malaysia's acting Transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein dismissed as "inaccurate" Thursday a report that claimed, based on engine data, that missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 may have flown for four hours following its last communication with air-traffic control.
Hishammuddin acknowledged that it is possible that the plane continued flying for a period of time but said a report in The Wall Street Journal stating that engine data from the jetliner continued to transmit information even after the plane lost contact with airport authorities was not correct.
The Journal issued a correction to its report, stating that it was based not on engine data but on unnamed U.S. investigators who analyzed signals sent through the plane's satellite-communication link, which transmits the status of some onboard systems.
The last data transmitted from the engines was received at 1:07 a.m. Saturday on the day the plane with 239 people on board vanished and indicated that "everything is operating normally," said Malaysia Airlines CEO Ahmad Jauhari Yahya.
In another twist in the search-and-rescue efforts now into their sixth day, Hishammuddin said that satellite images released Wednesday by China are not debris from the plane.
The murky images showed what might have been three pieces of debris of significant size, leading to a fruitless search Thursday by Malaysian aircraft in the area indicated, which matched the expected flight path.
Chinese authorities later explained the image release was an accident and did not show Flight 370 plane debris, said Hishammuddin. The publication on an official Chinese government agency website was a result of "personal behavior which is now under investigation," and was not authorized nor endorsed by the Chinese government, he said, reading from a statement from the Chinese Embassy to Malaysia.
The statement echoed remarks earlier from Li Jiaxing, China's civil aviation chief, that China could not confirm the debris pictured was from the missing plane.
Hishammuddin again defended the Malaysian authorities' response to what he called an "unprecedented" and "crisis" situation.
"We have not done anything that would jeopardize this search effort. … Malaysia has nothing to hide. We have spared no expense and no effort" in a search that he said has expanded to include 43 ships and 40 aircraft, operating on both sides of the Malaysian peninsula.
The original flight plan ran up the east side of the peninsula, over the South China Sea, but the search was extended in recent days to the west side — the Straits of Malacca — after military radar indicated the possibility of a plane making a turn back and flying into that area.
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board reviewed the data and agreed with Malaysian authorities that there were "reasonable grounds" to search on the western side of peninsular Malaysia, he said.
Malaysia would not ordinarily release raw data from its military radars, but "in this case we have put the search effort above our national security," and shared data with the USA, China and others, said Hishammuddin.Calum MacLeod and Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAY9:18 p.m. EDT March 13, 2014

Peristiwa Penting Dalam Negara sebelum MH370 hilang.

1. Kuala Lumpur, 11 March 2014. Pengerusi DAP, Karpal Singh hari ini dijatuhi hukuman denda sebanyak RM4,000 oleh Mahkamah Tinggi selepas didapati bersalah diatas tuduhan mengeluarkan perkataan berbaur hasutan terhadap Sultan Perak berhubung pengguguran Dato Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin sebagai Menteri Besar Perak pada tahun 2009. 

Hakim Datuk Azman Abdullah membuat keputusan itu selepas selesai mendengar rayuan terhadap keputusan yang dikemukakan oleh peguam Sangeet Kaur dan Gobind Singh dan Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Norin Badarudin. 

Karpal Singh, 73, didapati bersalah kerana mengeluarkan kenyataan di firma guamannya di Jalan Pudu Lama pada 6 Februari 2009 bahawa pengguguran Mohammad Nizar sebagai Menteri Besar dan Pelantikkan Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir oleh Sultan Perak boleh dipersoal di Mahkamah. 

Beliau didakwa mengikut Seksyen 4(1)(b) Akta Hasutan 1948 yang membawa hukuman maksimum penjara tiga tahun dan denda sebanyak RM5,000 atau kedua-duanya. Beberapa pemimpin Pakatan Pembangkang antaranya Lim Guan Eng, Nurul Izzah Anwar, Tian Chua, Mat Sabu hadir bersama ketika perbicaraan tersebut berlangsung. -UtaraNews.com.


2. Kini giliran PM Najib penjarakan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan mendapati Anwar bersalah dalam tuduhan liwat Saiful. Ini jawab Anwar tentang perkara tersebut yang dipetik dari Free Malaysia Today.
Fakta; DASI pernah dirawat tulang belakang, ironinya 'kes liwat'. 
“It’s all over again after 15 years. They want to put me in the lockup. That’s why they want to go ahead with the mitigation,” kata Anwar kepada pemberita.
Berita dari Malaysiakini
Ketua Umum PKR Anwar Ibrahim hari ini berkata sabitan terhadapnya hari ini adalah untuk memastikan beliau tidak boleh bertanding di Kajang.
Katanya, yang cukup menariknya ialah pendakwa yang dilantik kerajaan, Datuk Muhammad Shafee Abdullah membuat rujukan khas kepada Kajang dalam mitigasi.
“Peguam saya telah diminta mengosongkan tarikh 7-10 April, dan tarikh-tarikh ini telah dibawa ke hadapan kerana ini (Kajang),” katanya.
“Karpal mempunyai perbicaraan kes bunuh pada hari Khamis dan dia telah diminta mengosongkan tarikh itu untuk perbicaraan ini,” katanya.
Ditanya apa yang akan berlaku kepada Kajang tanpanya, ahli politik yang berusia 66 tahun itu berkata, kawasan pilihan raya itu akan menjadi lebih kuat.
Sambil ketawa Anwar berkata beliau yakin partinya akan menjadi lebih kukuh lagi kerana “bos mereka dalam kepayahan”.
“Saya secara peribadi akan ke sana dan berkempen bagi memastikan kemenangan,” katanya.
Gambar Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail hanya mampu mengalirkan air mata apabila mahkamah memutuskan Anwar Ibrahim bersalah atas tuduhan Liwat II.





Pelbagai Cerita Negatif Disebalik Kehilangan MH370.

                                            Bermula dengan kehilanagan MH370 dari radar.

Kemudian timbul pula dua orang rakyat Iran menaiki pesawat tersebut dengan menggunakan passport palsu.


Timbul pula cerita ketidakpuasan hati keluarga penumpang China tentang cara MAS kendalikan kes MH370.
Dalam kekalutan pasukan mencari MH370, keluar pula cerita bahawa pembantu juru terbang MH370 pernah mempelawa pelancong dari Afrika Selatan masuk ke kokpit pada tahun 2011.
Di samping itu kerana berlaku pencaggahan di mana sebenarnya MH370 terakhir dikesan, maka pihak Vitenam telah dilaporkan mengurangkan penggunaan pesawatnya untuk mencari MH370.

Di hari keempat keluar pula cerita 'Raja Bomoh" yang menggunakan beberapa kaedah syirik dalam upacara ritualnya di KLIA konon boleh kesan MH370. Lawa ini sekaligus menjejaskan lagi imej negara.
Pada hari kelima, pasukan penyelamat mula memberi tumpuan ke selat Melaka pula bila dikatakan kali terakih MH370 di kesan oleh radar TUDM di kawasan Pulau Pinang.


Masuk hari keenam, China keluarkan imej stalit dikaitkan dengan MH370. Bila APMM ke kawasan imej tersebut, tiada objek dikesan. Kemudian China keluarkan kenyataan berlaku kesilapan.

Selapas ini apalah pula cerita-cerita negatif tentang tragedi ini.


Khamis, 13 Mac 2014

Was flight MH370 lost in an aeronautical black hole

Was flight MH370 lost in an aeronautical black hole or did catastrophic power failure prevent air traffic control plotting its every move?

  • Boeing 777's transponder should provide information to traffic controllers
  • But at 1.20am on Saturday, transponder on flight MH370 stopped working
  • Experts baffled by loss of communication and subsequent lack of debris
  • One theory links 20 defence tech experts on board to electronic warfare
  • Another suggests a bomb went off while plane flew over Malaysian jungle
  • There are also 'aeronautical black holes' in the region that could mean the plane is hundreds - or even thousands 
  • -  of miles away from searches
  • Nuclear experts are now using a 'infrasound' to find out if an explosion took place at the altitude of the plane

With technology tracking our every move, it seems incredible that a plane carrying 239 passengers could vanish into thin air.
Yet despite flight data recorders, location transponders and radio communication, the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 disappeared on a midnight flight out of Kuala Lumpur on Friday.
Experts are baffled by the loss of communication, with some putting forward theories of mid-air bomb explosions, disappearance into an 'aeronautical black hole' and an attempt at electronic warfare. 
Scroll down for video...
Despite flight data recorders, location transponders and radio communication, the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 disappeared on a midnight flight out of Kuala Lumpur on Friday
Despite flight data recorders, location transponders and radio communication, the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 disappeared on a midnight flight out of Kuala Lumpur on Friday
The mystery has deepened after reports emerged that relatives have been able to call the mobiles of their missing loved ones.
Professor William Webb, a fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, told MailOnline: ‘The phones definitely won't be working. They'll be underwater, out of coverage and by this time out of battery.

WHAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED?

A mid-air explosion: The lack of debris could be explained by it falling into Malaysian jungle.
A terrorist attack: Director of CIA has said terrorism could not be ruled out
Power failure: Possibly caused by deliberate cutting of power to communication instruments 
Electronic warfare: 20 passengers on board were experts in this technology.
Hijacking: Radar data indicates the plane might have made a U-turn.
A pilot error: There is a chance of them in all air mysteries, claim experts
Structural failure: Possibly involving damage sustained by an accident in 2012
Pilot suicide: There were two large jet crashes in the late 1990s caused by this
Aeronautical black hole: Plane is stranded hundreds of miles from current search area
‘So there's absolutely no way they could be used for triangulation.
 
‘As to why they are "ringing" it'll be the same as if they were out of coverage - in some cases it may ring before going to voicemail.’
Some reports claim the phones are just ringing and ringing however.
Telecoms expert Alan Spencer told MailOnline that if the phones are really ringing, they can categorically not be under the sea.
He added that the phones will only be ringing if they are ‘switched on, not in water, the battery is charged, and [they are] near a mobile cell site.’
This means that if the phones are genuinely ringing, the plane needs to have landed on land – not in the sea – and be in a location where there is cell service, rather than in the middle of a jungle, for example. 
Meanwhile, the disappearance of the aircraft may be explained by a deliberate cutting of power to the plane’s communication instruments.
Dr Martyn Thomas from the Institution of Engineering and Technology, told MailOnline that he thinks a sudden decompression of the plane may have taken place and effectively knocked out the pilot and passengers – as well as the communication equipment.
In this scenario, the plane could have flown on using its autopilot without any human influence and ‘could be anywhere within about 2,000 miles’.
Another possibility is that the plane fell into an 'aeronautical black hole' in the region, according to Stewart John, an aeronautical expert and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering.
Radar is used to track planes over land in inhabited areas but when planes venture over remote lands, such as the inner part of Russia or over the jungles of Malaysia, the only way of tracking them is the aircraft sending back information at regular intervals, he explained.
The search for the missing aircraft has widened considerably after previous prediction of its whereabouts proved fruitless. It remains a mystery how a Boeing 777 could have disappeared without a trace in such relatively shallow seas
The search for the missing aircraft has widened considerably after previous prediction of its whereabouts proved fruitless. It remains a mystery how a Boeing 777 could have disappeared without a trace in such relatively shallow seas

WHAT COULD HAVE HAPPENED TO THE BLACK BOX?

The black box - which is actually orange - is used to record any instruction sent to the aircraft as well as conversations on radio and between the crew. 
When a plane is lost, the black box pings at a certain frequency for between 30 to 70 days and it can be detected within around five or six miles.
The box itself is designed to withstand the high impact of a plane crash, the pressures of the deep sea and the high and low temperatures of fire and ice.
‘But search parties could miss it if they are not close enough or are not detecting the correct frequency’, Dr Stewart John told MailOnline.
There also remains the possibility that a powerful enough force, such as a bomb, could have completely destroy the black box on the Malaysia flight.
The black box may also be too deep in the ocean for the recovery team to find. 
Honeywell’s black box units, for instance, emit signals that can be heard from 2.8 miles deep.
If the aircraft remained airborne after the last check-in it could still be hundreds of miles away from where people are searching.
Dr John thinks it is more likely that the aircraft was destroyed by an ‘explosive decompression’ – likely be a bomb on-board the plane.
He said that if a door or window was blown out, a pilot would be able to manage the situation. He explained that the catastrophe ‘had to be explosive [for the aircraft] to fall down from the sky…it would be more than just a panel blowing out’.
He added: ‘If they lost both engines, the pilot would have around 20 minutes - roughly equivalent to 70 to 80miles - to glide down from an altitude of 30,000 feet.’
However, Dr Martyn Thomas from the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET) believes that a civil or military tracking device must have clocked the aircraft’s location.
Aircraft are mostly tracked by secondary radar over land. 
Over large distances planes automatically transmit a four digit ‘squawk’ code showing its identification and altitude.
A system called Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) is used for when aircraft are out of normal radar range, such as over remote regions or oceans.
‘Aircraft ping out their location speed, heading and altitude, which are broadcast and logged. You can track any flight,’ Dr Thomas said.
Airplanes also send information to an airline about their performance and emergency warning data. ‘But appears none was received’ for the flight in question, he said.
‘It seems as if it took off, climbed to 30,000ft and maintained a level heading, then in the last few seconds started to turn right,’ Dr Thomas added.
The interior of the cockpit of a Boeing 777, similar to the one that disappeared early Saturday morning
The interior of the cockpit of a Boeing 777, similar to the one that disappeared early Saturday morning
‘It is known where the aircraft was within tens of metres when it lost contact,’ he explained, so it seems that there was ‘either a deliberate cutting of power to communications instruments such as radios and transponders, or a catastrophic event.’

HOW ARE FLIGHTS TRACKED?

On board a plane there are cockpit voice and flight data recorders – the ‘black boxes’ – which each include a ‘pinger’ that sends a transmission up to 30 days after submersion underwater.
In the black box is an ASD-B flight transponder which, unlike the GPS in a car, broadcasts its location by sending information back to air traffic controllers every second.
Crews are also able to speak to their airline through discrete radio channels. 
The missing aircraft was comfortably at a stage of flight when the pilot would have had plenty of time to report any mechanical problems to Air Traffic Control. 
Black boxes on commercial aircraft also contain cockpit voice recorders which could provide some insight into what went wrong on that plane at 1am on Friday morning.
It remains a mystery why no one can make contact with the box.
‘Something stopped communication instruments in the cockpit or there was a catastrophic failure – but it is very hard to understand,’ he added.
In a more radical theory, the possibility of electronic warfare has also been raised following confirmation that there were at least 20 passengers onboard from Texas-based Freescale Semiconductor. Each of these passengers had specialist knowledge of electronic technology for defence applications.
This could include ‘cloaking’ technology that uses a hexagonal array of glasslike panels to bend light around an object, such as plane, according to a report in Beforeitsnews.com.
Other techniques may have been used to jam signals, allowing the plane to vanish from radar detection without its security systems being activated.
‘It is conceivable that the Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 plane is “cloaked,” hiding with hi-tech electronic warfare weaponry that exists and is used,’ Beforeitsnews.com wrote.
‘In fact, this type of technology is precisely the expertise of Freescale that has 20 employees on board the missing flight.’
‘These were people with a lot of experience and technical background and they were very important people,’ Mr Mitch Haws, Global communications officer for the tech company, said.
The company recently launched a major initiative dedicated to serving radio frequency power needs of U.S. aerospace and defence sector.
The plane would also have been fitted with an indestructible black box recorder and a beacon to continue transmitting its location should it land in water
The plane would also have been fitted with an indestructible black box recorder and a beacon to continue transmitting its location should it land in water
The mystery of why no debris has been found at sea or over land is also leaving experts baffled, but there is a theory that if the plane crashed in the jungle, tall rubber trees, which are common in the region, could cover the crash site easily. 
Dr John said: ‘If it came down in a controlled way, it would carve a path through the trees – you would see a kind of runway – so it’s got to be a catastrophe and something out of the normal.’
On Monday, the head of the organisation that monitors the nuclear test ban treaty said he has asked its experts to see if they detected an explosion at the altitude of the missing plane.
Lassina Zerbo, executive director of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organisation (CTBTO) explained to a news conference that experts can use 'infrasound; - or infrasonic sensors - to monitor the planet  for atmospheric nuclear explosions.
'There's a possibility, it's not absolute, that the technology like the Infrazone could be able to detect an explosion,' he said in response to a question by CBS News
Infrasound are acoustic waves with very low frequencies that are inaudible to the human ear are called infrasound.
'Infrasound is produced by a variety of natural and man-made sources: exploding volcanoes, earthquakes, meteors, storms and auroras in the natural world; nuclear, mining and large chemical explosions, as well as aircraft and rocket launches in the man-made arena,' the CTBTO said.

WHY ARE THE PHONES STILL RINGING?

After three days, wouldn’t the phone batteries be dead by now? 
Not necessarily. Smartphones are renowned for their poor battery life and will typically last up to around 24 hours. But the batteries on older, feature phones can last much longer. 
For example, the Nokia 100 boasts a standby battery life of a staggering 35 days. Smartphone batteries can also last longer if the handset isn’t being used, and especially if the phone is in Flight Mode. 
However, if the phone is in Flight Mode, it switches off all wireless activity meaning calls wouldn’t be able to connect, effectively ruling out this theory.  

If the phone batteries are dead, wouldn’t the call go straight to voicemail?
In a word, yes. However, the process of sending the call to voicemail can differ depending on the service provider. 
For example, the majority of phones will go straight to voicemail, or callers will get an out of service message if voicemail hasn’t been set up. 
This will occur even if the phone is underwater, or not near a cell signal. 
However, some service providers will ring once or twice before the phone goes to voicemail, or cut off. This may explain the reports that claimed phones rang before seeming to hang up. 

Some reports claim the phones are just ringing and ringing though. How is this possible?
Telecoms expert Alan Spencer told MailOnline that if the phones are really ringing, they can categorically not be under the sea. 
Although he added that the phones will only be ringing if they are ‘switched on, not in water, the battery is charged, and [they are] near a mobile cell site.’
This means that if the phones are genuinely ringing, the plane needs to have landed on land – not in the sea – and be in a location where there is cell service, rather than landing in the middle of a jungle, for example. 

Why can’t network operators locate the phones?
A number of family members have asked the network operators why they can’t use the phone’s signal to locate the missing people. 
Professor William Webb, a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering, told MailOnline: ‘The phones definitely won't be working. They'll be underwater, out of coverage and by this time out of battery. 
‘So there's absolutely no way they could be used for triangulation. 
‘As to why they are ‘ringing’ it'll be the same as if they were out of coverage - in some cases it may ring before going to voicemail.’

What about the T3212 timer I’ve read about? 
The T3212 is a timer that causes a phone to periodically send a message to the network saying where it is. 
But Professor Webb said this only works when the phone is turned on and it is in coverage. It won't work when the battery is dead.

What about reports that passengers are appearing online, on the QQ social network?
When people sign into social networks including QQ, as well as Facebook, they appear online. 
This is the case whether they’ve signed in on a phone, tablet, PC, and laptop. If missing passengers are shown as online, they may not be using the service on their phone. Instead they may still be logged in on another device. 
If this other device shuts down or goes into standby, however, or there is a long period of inactivity, the social network will log them out, which may explain why some accounts went from online to offline over a period of three days.
Malaysia's Department Civil Aviation Director General, Azharuddin Abdul Rahman, pictured left, with Malaysian Airlines CEO Group Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, pictured right, during a press conference on the new search area
Malaysia's Department Civil Aviation Director General, Azharuddin Abdul Rahman, pictured left, with Malaysian Airlines CEO Group Ahmad Jauhari Yahya, pictured right, during a press conference on the new search area
The Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 disappeared along with 239 people on a midnight flight out of Kuala Lumpur on Friday.
On board were cockpit voice and flight data recorders – the ‘black boxes’ – which each include a ‘pinger’ that sends a transmission up to 30 days after submersion.
It was with an ASD-B flight transponder which, unlike the GPS in a car, broadcasts its location by sending information back to air traffic controllers every second.
Crews are also able to speak to their airline through 'discrete radio channels', according to aviation expert John Goglia, writing on the Forbes website.
A cabin crew of Division 918 of the Vietnam Air Force is onboard a flying Soviet-made AN-26 during the search operations
A cabin crew of Division 918 of the Vietnam Air Force is onboard a flying Soviet-made AN-26 during the search operations
'A complete electrical failure is extremely unlikely because of redundancies in the system’ he said.

THE UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

How can a plane simply disappear?
Why can't we make contact with the black box?
Why are the passengers' phone still ringing? And why are they showing as being online?
Why is there no debris?
Why would the plane do a u-turn to Kuala Lumpur?
If it was an act of terrorism, why has no organisation come forward?
Why did Malaysia Airlines report inconsistent times for the disappearance of the craft?
‘Especially the ram air turbine which uses the power of the wind generated by the aircraft’s motion in flight to generate electricity which would power critical navigation and communication systems, as well as flight controls.
'But even if the aircraft had a complete electrical failure, the aircraft could have continued to fly.'
He goes on to argue the plane could have eventually flown to an area where it would have been picked up again by radar, suggesting it was 'too early to speculate' on what has caused the disappearance.
Currently all that is known is the missing flight underwent ‘a steep and sudden descent’ and changed its heading.
An iPad is used to support orientation by a military official inside a Vietnamese Air Force plane during search and rescue operations for the missing Malaysian Airlines flight
An iPad is used to support orientation by a military official inside a Vietnamese Air Force plane during search and rescue operations for the missing Malaysian Airlines flight

 WHAT HAPPENED TO FLIGHT 370? SOME MORE POSSIBLE SCENARIOS

THEORY: A bomb
One of the theories surrounding the missing plane is that a terrorist boarded the plane and blew it up in mid-air. The theory was favoured after the discovery of two stolen passports linked to people with tickets for the flight. 
Robert Francis, former vice chairman of the U.S. National Transportation Board told Local10.com  that if flight 370 was blown up there would have been no signal and the plane could disappear from radar without warning. 
There is a theory that the plane could have been blown up over a jungle and that if the pilot was incapacitated or killed, the aircraft or debris could have fallen into or through the canopy, which is why it has yet to be found.
Problem: So far no debris of wreckage has been found that would indicate the aircraft was destroyed by a bomb blast. 
Dr Martyn Thomas, of the IET, told MailOnline that if a bomb had destroyed the aircraft over the sea where the search is currently focused, you would expect to see debris as the sea is shallower than the length of the aircraft and plenty of pieces would float, such as fibreglass panels and seat cushions.
It is unlikely that any explosion would have been captured by orbiting satellites as they could have to pass over the exact location at the correct time to record a flash from above. Experts have confirmed that oil slicks and debris found in the South China Sea didn’t originate from flight 370.

THEORY: Mechanical failure
The aircraft could have suffered a massive mechanical failure, which caused it to plummet onto water without breaking up. It could have sunk without leaving any debris behind.
Problem: In the past, pilots have managed to glide a plane more slowly down when engines have failed, giving them time to send an SOS. But no emergency signal was made, which would seem likely if pilots had to make the decision to ditch the aircraft.

THEORY: Hijacking

Radar data has indicated that the plane might have made a U-turn to head back to Kuala Lumur, which some experts think might indicate that the aircraft was hijacked. 
Problem: There are no reports of flight crew sending any signals to get help, which would be expected in a hijacking scenario.
Dr Thomas said that the hijacking theory is ‘odd’ because it is likely that a plane continuing a journey would have been detected by military radar somewhere in the region – especially if it made a U-turn and passed over busy areas of land.

THEORY: Pilot error
In all air mysteries, there is a chance that an error of judgement by the pilot was to blame. 
Problem: It is impossible to know if this is the case while the plane has yet to be recovered. A handful of aviation experts have compared flight 370 to an Air France disaster in 2009 when flight 447 went missing in a storm on the way to Brazil. After years of searching, the aircraft’s black box was recovered and revealed that pilots failed to attempt any recovery manoeuvres, but aside from the lack of evidence the Malaysia Air pilots acted in a similar way, weather was relatively good along Flight 370’s route.
THEORY: Autopilot kicked in
A decompression of the plane took place and effectively knocked out the pilot and passengers, as well as the communication equipment, according to another theory.
Commenting on the idea, Dr Thomas said that theoretically the plane could have flown on using its autopilot without any human influence and ‘could be anywhere within about 2,000 miles’ until its fuel ran out and it crashed.
Problem: In order for this theory to be proved correct, the plane’s wreckage black box would need to be found and Dr Thomas said that the theory is ‘highly speculative and not at all likely.’
The only way to find out is through the flight recorders.
Searchers are listening out for flight MH370's 406 megahertz Emergency Locator Transmitter, a unit that separates from aircraft wreckage and floats when it is immersed in saltwater.
Nine nations have now joined the attempt to find the mission. The operation involves 34 aircraft, 40 ships and a battery of search and rescue technologies.
The U.S. has flown a Lockheed Martin P-3C long-range search aircraft from its base in Okinawa, Japan, to Kuala Lumpur to undertake 10-hour nonstop search missions.
Vietnamese military personnel prepare a helicopter for a search and rescue mission for the missing Malaysia Airlines flight
Vietnamese military personnel prepare a helicopter for a search and rescue mission for the missing Malaysia Airlines flight
And the USS Pinckney, a guided missile destroyer, has been deployed so its two Sikorsky MH-60 Seahawk helicopters can be used to get close to any suspect wreckage.
The aircraft can also drop ‘sonobuoys’ which are floating devices that listen underwater and transmit what they detect via a radio antenna.
The disappearance of the Malaysian aircraft has some similarities to the Air France flight which vanished from radar screens an hour or so after take-off from Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, on 1 June 2009.
It crashed in waters 4 km deep in the Atlantic's and so was difficult to find. This jet, however, is likely to have gone down in waters just 100 metres deep, according to experts.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2578197/Is-Boeing-777-hiding-invisibility-cloak-lost-black-hole-Experts-try-unravel-mystery-Malaysia-Airlines-missing-aircraft.html#ixzz2vpISfJBZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook